What is the correspondence principle in tort law?

The correspondence principle in tort law emphasizes that there needs to be a connection between the intended outcome of an action and the actual outcome that occurs. This principle is particularly important in determining liability, as it ensures that a defendant can only be held responsible for the results of their actions if those results were foreseeable or intended.

By aligning the intended result with the actual result, the law aims to ensure fairness in adjudicating claims. If a defendant intended a specific action that leads to a specified consequence, they are more likely to be held liable. This principle helps provide a clear framework for understanding and establishing causation in tort cases.

In contrast, other options focus on aspect like intent without regard to results, the role of consent in liability, or arguing the irrelevance of outcomes, which do not align with the essential nature of the correspondence principle. Overall, it's the alignment of intention and result that solidifies this principle's role in tort law.